Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-7940X-$1,349
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.3% Very good
1-Core 111
2-Core 230
80% 170 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 801
73% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,933
130% 1,933 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 412
Parallax 437
81% 386 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 412
Splatting 245
104% 274 fps
Poor: 119%
This bench: 103%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$110
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 139 126 127 118 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 359
Write 183
Mixed 234
SusWrite 129
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 36.9
145% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 189
142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$87
176GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 435 401 407 408 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 459
Mixed 383
SusWrite 416
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 57.1
197% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 356
257% 335 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$130
99GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,007
Write 1,814
Mixed 1,281
378% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 79.4
280% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1204
DQ Write 1,065
DQ Mixed 1,120
844% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 212% Great: 395%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$95
890GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 96.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 90.9
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$63
112GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 94 82 99 145 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 134
Write 156
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 107
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$73
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 15.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 8.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback