Notebook N85_N870HL

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Notebook N85_N870HL (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N870HL
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 05:49
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 111 2-Core 209 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 401 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0 29,453 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Clevo(1558 8587) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 19.6 18% 18.9 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 20 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 304 305 304 305 304 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1,745 Write 1168 Mixed 963 SusWrite 477 242% 1,088 MB/s	4K Read 62.6 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 81.3 274% 95.2 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 1,084 DQ Mixed 1,012 767% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 280%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 4.7 5 4.6 4.6 4.4 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 5.1 13% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 122% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FB 1x16GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13.1 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N870HL Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N870HL

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	14x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	10x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	6x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	3x
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	3x
545s Series 256GBIntel $79Bench 96%, 17,432 samples	2x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.M16FB 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 243 samples	5x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,275 samples	2x
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GBCrucialBench 73%, 680 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16