Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 405 44% 350 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 161E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.62 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB 6,360 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 395 397 394 395 395 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 442 Write 410 Mixed 350 SusWrite 395 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 22 96% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 34 72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	813x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	122x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	24x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16