Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Memory 24 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 71.6 26% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 118 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 36C8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 2.66 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 0.13 1% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC150S37128GD 128GB 189 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 28 2.7 32 114 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 322 Write 243 Mixed 169 SusWrite 72.5 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 6.1 32% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 56.1 67% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 80%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 693 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 419GB free, PID b200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 32 32 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 30.6 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 32.3 42% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.4 152% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 6.7 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 293 14% 293 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16