| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B05 |
| Motherboard | MSI X299 TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7B05) (all builds) |
| Memory | 44.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170605 |
| Uptime | 8.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '19 at 13:54 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
75% 138 Pts
|
79% 662 Pts
|
109% 1,760 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
116%
Outstanding
|
126% 174 fps
|
110% 135 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 429 442 440 334 294 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
91% 405 MB/s
|
163% 64.1 MB/s
|
228% 324 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
84.3%
Excellent
|
96% 33.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
46% 87.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X299 TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7B05) Builds (Compare 263 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI X299 TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7B05)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 53x |
| Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 27x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $860 |