| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 3.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '19 at 01:01 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 61% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.4%
Below average
|
30% 45.9 Pts
|
15% 119 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.9%
Above average
|
53% 74.5 fps
|
65% 78.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 92 124 156 155 164 MB/s
|
80%
Very good
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
125% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
59GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 11 11 11 3.6 11 MB/s
|
4.43%
Terrible
|
14% 11.5 MB/s
|
3% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.2 GB/s
|
24% 168 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 8x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 7x |
| Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 4x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $405 |