Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '19 at 22:42
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 85.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 246 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 708 71% 579 Pts	64-Core 994 62% 994 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 101 Parallax 106 80% 102 fps	MRender 84.1 Gravity 95.5 Splatting 80 70% 86.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 75 42 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 315 Write 251 Mixed 223 SusWrite 71.6 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 5.5 41% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 85.5 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 17 50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 350GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 174 170 177 175 175 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 136 Write 124 Mixed 30 SusWrite 171 83% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3333C16 2x8GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 19.7 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	344x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $870

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16