Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 03:19
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600K-$145
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.2% Average
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 161
61% 127 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 437
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 423
28% 423 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$349
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 59.6
15% 59.6 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 59.6
18% 59.6 fps
Poor: 72%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 92%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 55 70 93 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 383
Write 364
Mixed 319
SusWrite 70
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 38
124% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.7
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 55.4
47% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 135%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
56GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 101 99 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 361
Write 307
Mixed 236
SusWrite 99.8
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 31.8
117% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 40.3
43% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$64
124GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 208 208 209 210 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 196
Write 209
Mixed 162
SusWrite 209
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.6
82% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 41.8
36% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
231GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 101 99 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 74
SusWrite 99.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
9GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 69 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43% Average
Read 79.2
Write 69.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 70
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 2,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback