Fujitsu SCENIC N300/N600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 13 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu SCENIC N300/N600  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D1521
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium 4 1.80GHz
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Memory 23.8
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 14
13% 18.3 Pts
4-Core 20.6
8-Core 20
3% 20.3 Pts
64-Core 20.6
1% 20.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 19%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD400BB-60DGA0 40GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.6 4.2 4.1 5.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Read 5.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.4
4% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 1.2
4% 1.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $460Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback