Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 428
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 84
57% 74.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 58.8
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 199 115 88 91 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 255
Write 234
Mixed 234
SusWrite 144
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 1.2
96% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 22.4
33% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
113GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 167
Write 156
Mixed 103
SusWrite 106
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 27.6
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback