Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S06PL
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 12:06
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 61%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3210M-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 75.9
29% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 105
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 103
7% 103 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.9
3% 9.63 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 16.8
3% 11.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$70
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 73 68 73 79 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 137
Write 74.9
Mixed 120
SusWrite 74.1
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 7.6
27% 9.5 MB/s
DQ Read 57.6
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 82.9
57% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 71%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 0.2
SusWrite 0.4
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$9
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Read 31
Write 10
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 13.7
17% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback