Hp-cpc 3ASAD013

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-cpc 3ASAD013  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn Lucknow
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071126
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 23:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3400-$19
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 50.7
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 25.9
24% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 30
8-Core 33.1
4% 31.5 Pts
64-Core 33
2% 33 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 36 45 41 20 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 62
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 32.1
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
448GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 58 93 93 41 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 59.4
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback