Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 00:27
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 813
79% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
MSI(1462 2980) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 56.5
38% 50.6 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 57
Splatting 44.3
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 262 263 264 263 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,188
Write 1,126
Mixed 1,123
SusWrite 293
261% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 89
303% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 262
362% 658 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 238%
Great: 244%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
21GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 379
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.7
200% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 179
175% 275 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
165GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 333 272 468 468 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 469
Mixed 444
SusWrite 362
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.9
183% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 222
192% 286 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
41GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 62 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 59.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 63.3
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 68%
ASMT 2105 1TB
45GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 71.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 14.5
56% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 29.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 28.3
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback