| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160505 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 21 '19 at 22:00 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.3%
Above average
|
47% 73.5 Pts
|
24% 184 Pts
|
10% 156 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.3%
Above average
|
44% 84.1 fps
|
87% 103 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 195 199 193 186 186 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
40% 180 MB/s
|
65% 21.2 MB/s
|
30% 40.5 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
540GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 199 200 195 188 188 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
40% 175 MB/s
|
72% 25.1 MB/s
|
30% 42.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
38.7%
Below average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
24% 8.57 GB/s
|
44% 91.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,344 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 536x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 207x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $280 |