Asus M11AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M11AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11AD
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 08:15
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 170
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 333
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.9% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 70.9
43% 53.1 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 44.2
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,651
Write 3,907
Mixed 3,818
918% 4,125 MB/s
4K Read 332
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 236
917% 260 MB/s
DQ Read 1,164
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1,100
823% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23
540GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 114
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
197GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 144 144 147 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 143
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2TB free, PID 3343
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 158 155 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 86.7
Write 86.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 157
135% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback