Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 10:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 503
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W512G1002 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 363 370 363 372 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 460
Write 403
Mixed 294
SusWrite 362
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 30.8
97% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 190
145% 196 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback