Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '19 at 03:59
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 147 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 411 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 71.7 58% 72.9 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 74.1 59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 476GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 141 138 131 135 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 165 Write 184 Mixed 149 SusWrite 139 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 26 81% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 33.6 29% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 107%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 119GB free Firmware: 0009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 123 125 124 119 125 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 207 Write 149 Mixed 158 SusWrite 127 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 15.7 80% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 17.6 23% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.4 6.8 5.4 5.4 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 7.3 8% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 168GB free Firmware: ML6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 21 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 73%
HitachiG ST 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 231GB free, PID 1015 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 24 Mixed 24 SusWrite 23.4 33% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 28GB 1,633 User benchmarks, average bench 56% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 10.6 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	531x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	255x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	93x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	446x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16