Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 12:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 106
35% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 210
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 21
Parallax 1.66
1% 8.13 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 7.26
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 79 85 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 32
Write 70.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 81
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
186% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 742
5% 742 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback