Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 618 61% 496 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 35.5 31% 34.5 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34.3 29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,834 Write 4,995 Mixed 4508 1,069% 4,779 MB/s	4K Read 395 4K Write 273 4K Mixed 272 1,091% 313 MB/s	DQ Read 960 DQ Write 1,067 DQ Mixed 952 734% 993 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 296GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 42 12 87 180 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 90.4 Write 94.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 75.1 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2 365% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.3% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	387x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	373x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	289x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	190x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	127x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	121x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	89x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16