To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 12:46
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2470 0 243 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 149 58% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 567 50% 427 Pts	64-Core 754 47% 754 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 8,236 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E371) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 22.4 15% 24.2 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 16.4 Splatting 32 22% 25.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: S031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 112 114 113 111 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 921 Write 199 Mixed 18 SusWrite 128 68% 317 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 21.9 98% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 2.3 57% 145 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 200%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 145GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 141 Write 134 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 98.7 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown lanshuo 0DB0- 1x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16