Lenovo 7665WB2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 7665WB2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 7665WB2
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120227
Uptime24.9 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7100
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 56.2
36% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 56.4
8% 56.1 Pts
64-Core 56.6
4% 56.6 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M
Legend(17AA 20D8) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 327.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.28
1% 0.84 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.26
1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 58 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 116
Write 93.6
Mixed 107
SusWrite 70.2
22% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 15.8
58% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 19.4
19% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback