PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 38 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160504 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '19 at 18:17 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | ISR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3767) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 405 354 346 420 425 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
187GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 99 119 117 117 117 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
894GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 177 174 174 181 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
44GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 500GB
22GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5 5.1 MB/s
|
7.12%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1GB free, PID a20c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
68GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 759x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 194x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 91x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 118x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 113x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $371 |