HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '19 at 23:27
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235 3,026 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 312 30% 250 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Below average	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 35.8 30% 34.4 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 34.7 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB 21,221 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 353 408 350 346 357 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 403 Write 420 Mixed 359 SusWrite 369 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 35.2 119% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 228 200% 301 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 117%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 24.2 Mixed 24 SusWrite 26 35% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 64% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x

RAM
HP655409-150-HYCG Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 4GBKingstonBench 48%, 3 samples	2x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBCorsairBench 29%, 4,128 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16