Acer AOD257

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer AOD257  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '16 at 07:34
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.14% Terrible
1-Core 5.8
2-Core 17.9
5% 11.9 Pts
4-Core 21.9
8-Core 29
3% 25.5 Pts
64-Core 31.5
2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 62.4
Write 41.5
Mixed 49.1
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.16
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung 4D3437314235363733445A312D43463820 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.18% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.9
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback