Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 17:51
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon X5470
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 152
54% 114 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 298
41% 299 Pts
64-Core 301
20% 301 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E115) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 3.1
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 2.3
8% 13.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 185 205 208 184 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 183
Write 157
Mixed 152
SusWrite 188
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 26.4
92% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 32.9
29% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$96
72GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 101 93 85 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 72.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 90.3
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
46GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 63 63 59 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 59
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$33
9GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 63 60 57 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 58.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 56.4
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 2,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback