PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 13.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '19 at 15:13 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 77% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 83 87 88 81 79 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
24.7%
Poor
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
284GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 88 89 82 80 MB/s
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
145GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 70 74 73 73 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 73 68 74 74 71 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 508x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |