Lenovo 3664AV1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo 3664AV1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 01:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-2130-$88
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 167
71% 116 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 230
15% 230 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 84 68 81 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 81.3
Write 119
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 78.9
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $187Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback