| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP hp workstation xw6200 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 08B8h |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 2.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20050602 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '19 at 18:10 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
32.9%
Below average
|
29% 41.5 Pts
|
9% 68.6 Pts
|
4% 68.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.12%
Terrible
|
8% 9.5 fps
|
9% 11 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33.08F33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 45 45 54 65 64 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
36% 49.5 MB/s
|
180% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26
105GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 49 90 81 98 100 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
60% 82 MB/s
|
179% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 34GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 33280 MB
|
9.92%
Terrible
|
7% 2.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.33 GB/s
|
28% 145 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP hp workstation xw6200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 30%, 29 samples | 2x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples | 1x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 33%, 38 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 1x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |