PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus WS X299 PRO_SE (all builds) |
Memory | 122.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190411 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 19 '19 at 16:15 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
CPU Throttled | 69% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
91%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 443 455 504 525 529 MB/s
|
247%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$149
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 455 468 518 539 542 MB/s
|
231%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 304 314 342 357 358 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905701-022.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
6.21%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples | 23x |
Core i9-9820XIntel $550Bench 82%, 2,515 samples | 16x |
Core i9-7980XEIntel $1,099Bench 80%, 4,653 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $585Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 13x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 10x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $749 |