Gigabyte Z370 HD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 HD3P (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 13:35
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 117 2-Core 238 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 492 60% 458 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gainward(10B0 1C03) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46% Average	Lighting 58.3 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 53.7 48% 57.8 fps	MRender 54.4 Gravity 52.7 Splatting 51.7 43% 52.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 229 134 189 178 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 430 Write 243 Mixed 255 SusWrite 165 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 33.8 126% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 191 157% 222 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 641GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 187 185 183 184 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 169 Write 160 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 184 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB 22,335 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	69.7% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 22.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 19.7 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3P - $115

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	347x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	246x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	131x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	88x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	78x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	42x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $541

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16