Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 142
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 430
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 35.3
24% 32.2 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 37.3
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 123 121 115 94 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 409
Write 366
Mixed 272
SusWrite 143
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 36.1
134% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 148
140% 218 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 108%
Intel SS DSCKKW240H6 240GB
101GB free
Firmware: LSB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 102 102 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 416
Write 359
Mixed 334
SusWrite 130
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 29.1
102% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 222
172% 235 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 89%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
77GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 129 131 131 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 130
SusWrite 131
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.5
313% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 111%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
69GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 76 71 71 75 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41% Average
Read 68.2
Write 79.5
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 74.3
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 69%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.4 3.4 2.7 1.9 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.6
7% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 9%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 9.6 9.1 8.6 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9
12% 10 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback