Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180814
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '19 at 19:58
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$258 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 130 2-Core 263 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 517 8-Core 764 80% 640 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 152 Parallax 131 119% 143 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 142 Splatting 112 100% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 134 136 126 128 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 375 Mixed 404 SusWrite 182 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 52.6 176% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 198GB free Firmware: EXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 256 256 256 255 254 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 424 Write 295 Mixed 314 SusWrite 278 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 45.1 161% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 227 205% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 687GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 149 151 151 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 150 Mixed 100 SusWrite 150 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 23.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 25.3 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,205x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,162x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	917x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,024x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	793x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	629x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $65Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	500x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	490x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	435x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,079

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16