| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131106 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 14 '19 at 23:11 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 67% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
34.4%
Below average
|
33% 53.3 Pts
|
15% 126 Pts
|
12% 192 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
27% 33.7 fps
|
36% 44.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 84 5.1 4.8 21 107 MB/s
|
22.7%
Poor
|
46% 206 MB/s
|
21% 5.27 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
99GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 104 141 132 114 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
164% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
32.4%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
13% 4.7 GB/s
|
26% 151 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 644x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 437x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 159x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |