HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3398
Memory	2.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '19 at 02:55
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470S CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 156 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 265 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3398) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 4.48 3% 3.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 66 54 65 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 88.5 Write 102 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 65.6 58% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 82%
General UDisk 2TB 1,229 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 5.3 13 12 12 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 10 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 10.2 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 38%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 19 Write 14 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 14.2 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

CPU
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples	243x
Core i5-3570SIntelBench 70%, 3,597 samples	66x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	51x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	400x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	76x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	10x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16