Panasonic CF-31ACN851M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.52% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-31ACN851M  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF31-1
Memory5 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110119
Uptime21.9 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 19:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 75
26% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 87.5
13% 96.4 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Device(10F7 8338) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 2.31
2% 2.82 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 35 41 44 46 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.52% Terrible
Read 46.4
Write 63.4
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 41.6
12% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 4
13% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 48GB
1067, 1067, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 40960 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback