Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111020
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 358 37% 299 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 0338) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	9.18% Terrible	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 9.15 Parallax 9.91 9% 10.2 fps	MRender 9.57 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 13 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 49 35 30 29 31 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 203 Write 203 Mixed 181 SusWrite 45.8 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 33.1 99% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 38.2 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 46.9 40% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 763GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 55 37 32 37 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 117 Write 36.3 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 52.6 51% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 404GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 89.2 68% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 76%
ST310003 40AS 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 314GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 26 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 8.6 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 20%
Maxell HDD 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 20GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.4 8.1 8.5 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.86% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 20 Mixed 19 SusWrite 8.3 24% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.86% Great: 20%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 47GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 8.5 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID b202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.7 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 24.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 8.6 27% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 48%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3.5TB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 24.8 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 8.6 28% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	373x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16