Asus K53SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K53SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 371
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,416
Write 4,073
Mixed 4,099
937% 4,196 MB/s
4K Read 300
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 198
802% 225 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 544
409% 554 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSA302G08-GDJEC 830B NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SC Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $95
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback