PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-P PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160429 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '19 at 13:51 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 128 128 103 38 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
193GB free
Firmware: B1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 137 137 139 125 136 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
188GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 106 105 99 100 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 75x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 68x |
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 37x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |