| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Notebook P95_HP (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Notebook P95_HP |
| Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180807 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 23 '19 at 14:03 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
58.3%
Above average
|
56% 93.9 Pts
|
36% 290 Pts
|
23% 368 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 9501) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
15.9%
Very poor
|
8% 18.7 fps
|
31% 34.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 283 297 290 315 324 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
79% 352 MB/s
|
88% 31.3 MB/s
|
236% 318 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
63.9%
Good
|
68% 23.8 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
44% 91.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P95_HP Builds (Compare 46 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Notebook P95_HP
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 29x |
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $140 |