Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 53 2-Core 106 51% 79.7 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 201 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 16 40 50 51 46 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 232 Write 92.7 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 41.7 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 13 52% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 26.8 19% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 85%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 99GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 19 40 51 51 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 62 Write 56.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 43 37% 50 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAB F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-1600C9-4GAB F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

SSD
PM841 2.5" 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 1,340 samples	3x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	3x
120GB SATA SSD 120GBPNYBench 69%, 681 samples	2x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. 2x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 1,274 samples	3x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 11,344 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	2x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $81

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16