HP h8-1160t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP h8-1160t (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB5
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111012
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 02:49
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 433 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 20.4 Parallax 27.1 18% 23.1 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 24.3 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 367 Write 210 Mixed 241 60% 273 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 29 107% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 31.5 92% 199 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 78GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 113 Write 47.3 Mixed 70.3 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.4 311% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 121GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 100 Write 66.3 Mixed 59 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.4 309% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 65GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 88 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 45.3 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 89.4 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID 1140 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 111 Write 110 Mixed 57.8 114% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
Jmicron Corp. 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 41GB free, PID 2509 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,452 Write 4 Mixed 9 764% 1,155 MB/s	4K Read 563 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.2 2,142% 188 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 61%
WD My Book Elite 1TB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 6GB free, PID 1111 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.8 Write 24.8 Mixed 23 32% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
WD My Book 1140 1TB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 31GB free, PID 1140 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 78 79 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 61.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 77.9 86% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 48%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 30GB free, PID 1140 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 76.3 129% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD My Book Elite 1TB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID 1111 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31 Write 24.3 Mixed 23.5 32% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 13GB free, PID a202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 25 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 25.7 34% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 2,942 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1160t Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1160t

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	4x
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	3x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
HG6 256GBToshibaBench 86%, 4,588 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	2x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 4x4GBMicronBench 47%, 423 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16