Medion ERAZER X5399 F/C163

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5399 F/C163 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160602
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '19 at 12:10
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 202 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 576 58% 472 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 53.2 Reflection 58.7 Parallax 52 43% 54.6 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 48.1 44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 96 79 75 75 74 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 486 Write 194 Mixed 197 SusWrite 85.8 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 33.3 137% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 208 169% 245 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 599GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 108 109 105 106 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 133 Write 114 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 108 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5399 F/C163 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Medion ERAZER X5399 F/C163

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	3x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16