Asus H110M-A/DP

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/DP (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 12:14
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6320-$165 1,734 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 193 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 260 37% 272 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 60.7 56% 65.9 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 53.7 50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 252 262 263 258 247 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.7% Above average	Read 245 Write 192 Mixed 109 SusWrite 254 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 25.1 84% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 177 124% 154 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 154GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 120 123 117 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 10.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 126 39% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.1 41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 20 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 17 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/DP

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	78x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	73x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	30x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	39x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	26x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	19x
P200 256GBPatriotBench 57%, 1,581 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	38x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GBCrucialBench 75%, 23 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $347

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16