Acer NC-V3-572G-7535

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer NC-V3-572G-7535  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HB
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 21
2-Core 31.7
34% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 86.7
8-Core 170
15% 128 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 128 199 175 108 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 335
Write 223
Mixed 244
SusWrite 158
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 10.6
45% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 67.6
78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback