MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A35
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 17:01
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 873 82% 679 Pts	64-Core 1,257 78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85E9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 151 Parallax 141 113% 143 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 136 Splatting 111 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1635 1200 812 810 809 810 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,579 Write 2,315 Mixed 1,809 SusWrite 1,013 431% 1,929 MB/s	4K Read 64.3 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 84.2 274% 92.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,001 DQ Write 712 DQ Mixed 919 670% 877 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 308 307 305 303 302 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 481 Mixed 399 SusWrite 324 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 60.3 205% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 355 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 484 485 487 421 292 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 488 Mixed 458 SusWrite 441 107% 474 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 56.5 192% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 174 168 173 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 140 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 171 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 36.2 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 24 SC Write 41.2 SC Mixed 30.2 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	12x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	9x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)