IBM 00Y8362

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM 00Y8362 (all builds)
Memory	47.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180223
Uptime	19.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '19 at 05:44
Run Duration	552 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 619 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 55.8 2-Core 113 45% 75.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 496 42% 361 Pts	64-Core 1,192 74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 120 121 121 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 127 Write 104 Mixed 121 SusWrite 120 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 18.4 61% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 86.7 DQ Mixed 96.3 72% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 128%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 512GB 69GB free Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1,963 Write 1,795 Mixed 1,996 429% 1,918 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 38.1 130% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 247 190% 257 MB/s

IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 2TB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 222 226 219 216 216 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	137% Outstanding	Read 1,840 Write 965 Mixed 1,979 SusWrite 223 279% 1,252 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 36.7 122% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 273 206% 275 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 293%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 512GB 244GB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 230 231 230 231 229 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	141% Outstanding	Read 1,816 Write 1,644 Mixed 1819 SusWrite 233 308% 1,378 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 33.5 140% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 258 194% 258 MB/s

IBM ServeRAID M5110e 512GB 152GB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 227 231 230 231 230 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	137% Outstanding	Read 1,836 Write 1,597 Mixed 1,826 SusWrite 232 307% 1,373 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 35.4 123% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 250 189% 253 MB/s

IBM ServeRAID M5110e 500GB 323GB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 230 230 230 230 230 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	128% Outstanding	Read 1,601 Write 1,585 Mixed 1,786 SusWrite 233 292% 1,302 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 34.1 123% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 262 196% 260 MB/s

IBM ServeRAID M5110e 999GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 406GB free Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,822 Write 1,830 Mixed 1,872 412% 1,841 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 35.2 126% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 263 199% 265 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 410%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 999GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 212GB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 119 120 120 121 121 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 1,858 Write 1,191 Mixed 1,953 SusWrite 121 286% 1,281 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 33.7 120% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 265 198% 262 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 410%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 4TB 903GB free Firmware: 3.46 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1774 Write 1,405 Mixed 1,683 361% 1,621 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 28.4 104% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 215 161% 217 MB/s

ST6000VN 0033-2EE110 6TB 828GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 163 162 155 161 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.7% Very good	Read 172 Write 166 Mixed 109 SusWrite 161 204% 152 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.2 215% 5.43 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-YK0 6x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6 of 24 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 00Y8362

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)