| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140402 |
| Uptime | 7.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '19 at 06:20 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
55.1%
Above average
|
63% 109 Pts
|
35% 300 Pts
|
25% 407 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.9%
Above average
|
57% 66 fps
|
50% 61.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 64 57 41 71 81 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
60% 81.8 MB/s
|
94% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
36.3%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
25% 8.67 GB/s
|
43% 92.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 413x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 394x |
| Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples | 350x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 162x |
| GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples | 155x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 142x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $323 |