| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130830 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 07 '19 at 23:14 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
55% 86.9 Pts
|
26% 200 Pts
|
13% 204 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
|
22.8%
Poor
|
22% 32.2 fps
|
24% 28.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 302 303 309 311 299 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
70% 313 MB/s
|
120% 43.6 MB/s
|
116% 193 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
34.7%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
51% 77.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 4x |
| A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 3x |
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples | 2x |
| HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $145 |