PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181219 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 07 '19 at 04:44 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
|
20.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PT05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 53 89 101 99 MB/s
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
306GB free
Firmware: AX0N9E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 77 77 76 MB/s
|
||||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9.4 8.3 9.4 9.5 9.3 MB/s
|
6.46%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HX424C15FB/8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 161x |
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $129Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 102x |
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $104Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $191 |