Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 79.3 35% 56.6 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 169 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.19 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 5.7 3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: T170601b SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 23 19 15 29 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 397 Write 9.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 21.3 23% 112 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 7.3 53% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 83.7 DQ Write 1 DQ Mixed 43.8 31% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1.5GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16